Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Bu Yunchaokete vs Edan Leshem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yunchaokete vs Leshem analysis and find out who is favored!
Bu Yunchaokete vs Edan Leshem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yunchaokete 1 - 0 Leshem
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yunchaokete has won 51.82% of points on his second serve, while Leshem has won 38.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yunchaokete, in recent form, has won 51.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Leshem has won 55.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.77% and 34.78% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yunchaokete has saved 61.27% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leshem has saved 46.88% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yunchaokete has won 62.96% of matches played (W/L 34/ 20), with Leshem winning 53.33% (W/L 8/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yunchaokete has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 73% (W/L 128/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6). Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 162), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Yunchaokete has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 32/ 16), where as Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 6/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Yunchaokete winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Yunchaokete winning 2 and Leshem winning 1. The last match between Yunchaokete and Leshem was at the M25 Tbilisi, 13-08-2022, Final, Hard with Bu Yunchaokete getting the victory 6-3 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Yunchaokete and Leshem have played a deciding set 1 times, with Yunchaokete winning 1 times and Leshem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Yunchaokete winning 0, and Leshem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yunchaokete has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.31 while Leshem has played against players with an average rank of 152.47.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yunchaokete has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leshem has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yunchaokete has converted 43.14% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leshem has converted 48.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
189
Rank
164
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
69% (145-66)
Career Total W/L
58% (308-220)
68% (19-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$71,885
Career Prize Money
$26,870
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Yunchaokete VS Leshem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Bu Yunchaokete | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:7:0 | 2:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (47/68) | 56% (42/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (36/47) | 69% (29/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (8/21) | 55% (18/33) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (28/75) | 35% (24/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Yunchaokete VS Leshem H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Edan Leshem
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Bu Yunchaokete | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (19/9) | 25% (1/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (41/23) | 25% (2/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (334/293) | 45% (33/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (15/5) | 25% (1/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.56 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 170 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:38 | 1:27:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 232.96 | 119 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (1148/1970) | 66% (159/240) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (812/1148) | 58% (93/159) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (426/822) | 38% (31/81) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (88/204) | 48% (14/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (802/1992) | 42% (93/219) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 72% (18/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (17/26) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (21/17) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (21/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (3/0) |
Bu Yunchaokete Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Gustavo Heide
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Alex Molcan
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Egor Gerasimov
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Philip Sekulic
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
89
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Linang Xiao
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
12
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Omar Jasika
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
54%
(
45 of
83)
1st Serve %
46%
(
47 of
102)
7
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
James Duckworth
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
9
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Antoine Escoffier
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Ofek Shimanov
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
50%
(
53 of
105)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Yunchaokete Vs Leshem Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
